1) The advice of the authors that we need to find the literal and historical backgrounds hinges on the principle in the introduction, which says that the text can never mean what it never meant originally. Is it ever okay to read into the text? If so, when can it be? For instance, I've heard it said, "Jesus is the greater Moses who rescued humanity from slavery." If the Gospel authors never believed that, is that a legitimate statement?
2) For a deeper attempt to critically examine the question above, read Matthew 1-2. Are there events described about Jesus that parallel the life of Moses? If you believe so, do you think this makes the statement above about Jesus and Moses legitimate? But, if the author had non-historical intentions, like making parallels between Jesus and Moses, can that narrative in Matthew be historically doubted?
3) For fun, and in keeping with the structure described on 56-57, practice writing your own "real letter". Length is irrelevant. We'll share in our next meet!
No comments:
Post a Comment